This example report shows the type of website trust analysis WebTrust OS produces. It uses an illustrative company profile for demonstration — visual scores, plain-English findings, region comparison, and AI-drafted fixes.
Five weighted dimensions combine into the overall WebTrust score. Weighting can be tuned by industry — this profile is weighted for an e-commerce store.
Detected analytics, advertising, and embedded third-party tools — compared against what the privacy & cookie policy actually discloses.
| Technology | Category | Disclosure | Notes |
|---|
Each finding includes what we saw, why it matters, and a specific recommendation. Severity drives the order.
How the site's disclosures map to common expectations across the selected markets. This is an educational comparison, not a legal determination.
| Requirement area | EU/EEA | UK | California | Your site |
|---|
Not legal advice. “Expected / Often / Varies” reflect common privacy-program expectations for educational comparison. Confirm obligations with qualified legal counsel for your specific situation.
Ranked so a team can work top-down. Knock out the high-severity items first for the biggest jump in score.
Draft copy and developer tasks you can paste straight into the site. Always review AI drafts before publishing.
Reports are informational and do not certify legal compliance or guarantee search engine rankings. See our Disclaimer for details.
Recommended next step: fix the top five issues, then rescan to measure improvement. Most sites see a meaningful jump once tracker disclosure and homepage clarity are addressed.